<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Turning Left &#187; Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.turningleft.net/category/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.turningleft.net</link>
	<description>On the Liberal Front</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg: Gingrich Sued for Using ‘Eye of the Tiger’ at Campaign Stops</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/bloomberg-gingrich-sued-for-using-eye-of-the-tiger-at-campaign-stops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/bloomberg-gingrich-sued-for-using-eye-of-the-tiger-at-campaign-stops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime and Punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Bloomberg News: Newt Gingrich, fighting for the Republican Party&#8217;s nomination to challenge President Barack Obama in the 2012 election, was sued for unauthorized use of &#8220;Eye of the Tiger,&#8221; the Grammy-winning theme song from &#8220;Rocky III.&#8221; Rude Music Inc., an Illinois corporation owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the song, sued the candidate today in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-30/gingrich-sued-for-playing-eye-of-the-tiger-at-rallies-without-permission.html" target="_blank">From Bloomberg News</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://topics.bloomberg.com/newt-gingrich/" density="sparse">Newt Gingrich</a>, fighting for the Republican Party&rsquo;s nomination to challenge President <a href="http://topics.bloomberg.com/barack-obama/" density="full">Barack Obama</a> in the 2012 election, was sued for unauthorized use of &ldquo;Eye of the Tiger,&rdquo; the Grammy-winning theme song from &ldquo;Rocky III.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Rude Music Inc., an Illinois corporation owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the song, sued the candidate today in federal court in<a href="http://topics.bloomberg.com/chicago/" density="full">Chicago</a>, seeking a court order blocking Gingrich&rsquo;s unauthorized use of the song at campaign rallies. Rude Music is also seeking unspecified money damages.</p>
<p>Newt 2012 Inc. and the American Conservative Union, a political advocacy group, are also named as defendants in the five-page complaint.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You mean you can&#8217;t just take anyone&#8217;s music and play it anywhere, particularly for the purpose of raising money for your own political campaign? What? What about the First Amendment.</p>
<p>Oh. Right.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t apply in this case.</p>
<p>Yoi. Another ethical lapse for the former speaker?
</p>
<p>And, yes, you can be sued for stealing music.</p>
<p>Is that what Newt did? The courts will decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/bloomberg-gingrich-sued-for-using-eye-of-the-tiger-at-campaign-stops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very Distressing: Charles Taylor, Liberian Ex-president, Had CIA Ties</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/very-distressing-charles-taylor-liberian-ex-president-had-cia-ties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/very-distressing-charles-taylor-liberian-ex-president-had-cia-ties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 05:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I think of Charles Taylor, I think of &#8220;blood diamonds.&#8221; And I am relieved that Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is currently President of Liberia, a country still recovering from the slave trade. Still recovering from the devastation wreaked by Europe and the Americas. So I was distressed to learn this week that Charles Taylor, currently on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 622px"><img class=" " title="Charles Taylor" src="http://www.aljazeera.com/mritems/Images/2011/2/8/20112810938546360_20.jpg" alt="Charles Taylor" width="612" height="405" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Former Liberian President Charles Taylor, currently on trial.</p></div>
<p>When I think of Charles Taylor, I think of &#8220;blood diamonds.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I am relieved that Ellen Johnson Sirleaf is currently President of Liberia, a country still recovering from the slave trade.</p>
<p>Still recovering from the devastation wreaked by Europe and the Americas.</p>
<p>So I was distressed to learn this week that Charles Taylor, currently on trial for Crimes Against Humanity, was at one point employed by the United States&#8217; Central Intelligence Agency.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/01/2012120202722392322.html" target="_blank">From Al Jazeera</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Liberia&#8217;s Charles Taylor, the first African head of state to be prosecuted for war crimes by an international tribunal, used to work with the CIA, according to a report in the <em>Boston Globe</em> from this week.</p>
<p>The report, based on information uncovered through a Freedom of Information Act request made six years ago, said that Taylor had a relationship with the US spy agency for years, although the details of what he actually did were unclear.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Pentagon&#8217;s response to the <em>Globe</em> states that the details of Taylor&#8217;s role on behalf of the spy agencies are contained in dozens of secret reports &#8211; at least 48 separate documents &#8211; covering several decades,&#8221; the US newspaper said.</p>
<p>&#8220;However, the exact duration and scope of the relationship remains hidden.&#8221;</p>
<p>A spokesperson for the ICC told the <em>Globe</em> that the Taylor-CIA relationship was unrelated to his charges at the court.</p>
<p>The <em>Globe</em> report backed up long-standing rumours of Taylor&#8217;s work with the CIA, which confirmed a relationship with Taylor beginning in the early 1980s.</p></blockquote>
<p>Even though this happened during the Reagan administration, this still gives me no pride.</p>
<p>Charles Taylor?</p>
<p>Think &#8220;blood diamonds.&#8221;</p>
<p>And mass executions.</p>
<p>Taylor  is accused of 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity on claims that he armed Sierra Leone&#8217;s Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in exchange for illegally mined, so-called blood diamonds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/very-distressing-charles-taylor-liberian-ex-president-had-cia-ties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the War on Drugs Became a Race War (MSNBC Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/how-the-war-on-drugs-became-a-race-war-msnbc-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/how-the-war-on-drugs-became-a-race-war-msnbc-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime and Punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy How the war on drugs became a race war, from the Dylan Ratigan Show on MSNBC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="cc">
<object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc8da475" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=46016100&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed name="msnbc8da475" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=46016100&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>
<p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">news about the economy</a></p>
</div>
<p>How the war on drugs became a race war, from the Dylan Ratigan Show on MSNBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/how-the-war-on-drugs-became-a-race-war-msnbc-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt Gingrich Wanted an Open Marriage, Says Second Wife</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/newt-gingrich-wanted-an-open-marriage-second-wife-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/newt-gingrich-wanted-an-open-marriage-second-wife-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try to keep up. It&#8217;s tough. From the Wall Street Journal: Newt Gingrich wanted an open marriage, former wife Marianne Gingrich said in an interview with ABC News. ABC just put out a video clip and excerpts of the interview, which is scheduled to air on Nightline tonight after the GOP presidential debate in South Carolina. Ms. Gingrich, who was married [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="cc">
<object id="wsj_fp" width="512" height="363"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/main.swf" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID={B9BF62EA-D0A1-422F-964B-E5F40C5773E5}&#038;playerid=1000&#038;plyMediaEnabled=1&#038;configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&#038;autoStart=false" base="rtmpt://wsj.fcod.llnwd.net/a1318/o28/video"name="main"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/main.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"flashVars="videoGUID={B9BF62EA-D0A1-422F-964B-E5F40C5773E5}&#038;playerid=1000&#038;plyMediaEnabled=1&#038;configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&#038;autoStart=false" base="rtmpt://wsj.fcod.llnwd.net/a1318/o28/video" name="main" width="512" height="363" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></div>
<p>Try to keep up.  It&#8217;s tough.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/01/19/gingrichs-ex-wife-he-wanted-an-open-marriage/" target="_blank">From the Wall Street Journal</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Newt Gingrich</strong> wanted an open marriage, former wife <strong>Marianne Gingrich</strong> said in an interview with ABC News.</p>
<p>ABC just put out <a href="http://abcnews.com/Blotter/video/marianne-gingrich-interview-15392793">a video clip</a> and <a href="http://abcnews.com/Blotter/exclusive-gingrich-lacks-moral-character-president-wife/story?id=15392899">excerpts of the interview</a>, which is scheduled to air on Nightline tonight after the GOP presidential debate in South Carolina. Ms. Gingrich, who was married to the former House speaker for 18 years, said she is disclosing details of her marriage now to tell voters what she knows about Mr. Gingrich&rsquo;s character. The two divorced in 1999, after, she says, Mr. Gingrich had suggested an open marriage that would allow him to continue an affair with <strong>Callista Bisek</strong>,  the congressional aide who later became his third wife.</p>
<p>Ms. Gingrich told ABC&rsquo;s <strong>Brian Ross</strong> that after Mr. Gingrich made that suggestion, &ldquo;I just stared at him and he said, &lsquo;Callista doesn&rsquo;t care what I do&rsquo;…  He wanted an open marriage and I refused.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s Newt Gingrich, conservative Catholic.</p>
<p>Yoi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/newt-gingrich-wanted-an-open-marriage-second-wife-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dogs Against Romney: Mitt Really Really Abused the Family Dog Seamus</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/dogs-against-romney-mitt-really-really-abused-the-family-dog-seamus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/dogs-against-romney-mitt-really-really-abused-the-family-dog-seamus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy Mitt Romney tied his dog Seamus to the roof of a car for a family vacation. The dog got sick. Romney hosed down the dog and went on. Abuse? You bet. In response to a query on this Chris Wallace at Fox News, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="cc">
<object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc8549d7" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=45980205&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed name="msnbc8549d7" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=45980205&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>
<p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">news about the economy</a></p>
</div>
<p>Mitt Romney tied his dog Seamus to the roof of a car for a family vacation. </p>
<p>The dog got sick.</p>
<p>Romney hosed down the dog and went on.</p>
<p>Abuse? You bet.</p>
<p>In response to a query on this Chris Wallace at Fox News, Romney says, &quot;This is a completely air-tight kennel on the top of our car.&quot;</p>
<p>If the kennel was &quot;air-tight,&quot; how did the &quot;brown liquid&quot; pour from the dog&#8217;s kennel atop the wagon?</p>
<p>For more information:</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://spreadingromney.com/">http://spreadingromney.com/</a></li>
<li> <a href="http://www.dogsagainstromney.com/">http://www.dogsagainstromney.com/</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/dogs-against-romney-mitt-really-really-abused-the-family-dog-seamus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Willard &#8216;Mitt&#8217; Romney: The (Un-)Artful Dodger</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/willard-mitt-romney-the-un-artful-dodger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/willard-mitt-romney-the-un-artful-dodger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who watched the GOP circular firing squad Saturday night, you may recall Mitt Romney referring to a question about states banning birth control &#8220;silly.&#8221; The only thing &#8220;silly&#8221; was his dodge, as he tried to deny his own state the right to offer birth control in 2005. From the Huffington Post: Mitt Romney [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 537px"><img title="Ask Romney Anything?" src="http://www.exposemittromney.com/image/askromney.jpg" alt="Ask Romney Anything?" width="527" height="350" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ask Willard &quot;Mitt&quot; Romney, the (Un-)Artful Dodger, anything? Really?</p></div>
<p>For those who watched the GOP circular firing squad Saturday night, you may recall Mitt Romney referring to a question about states banning birth control &#8220;silly.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only thing &#8220;silly&#8221; was his dodge, as he tried to deny his own state the right to offer birth control in 2005.</p>
<p><a title="Mitt Romney Vetoed Contraception Bill For Rape Victims As Governor " href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/09/mitt-romney-contraception-veto-morning-after-pill_n_1194422.html" target="_blank">From the Huffington Post</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mitt Romney artfully dodged a question about whether states have the right to ban birth control during Saturday&#8217;s Republican presidential debate, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/romney-calls-question-about-contraception-silly-says-amendments-give-rights-not-judges/2012/01/07/gIQAI4H1hP_story.html" target="_hplink">calling the question &#8220;silly&#8221;</a> and saying that states wouldn&#8217;t want to do that anyway. But as governor of Massachusetts in 2005, Romney took a harder line on contraception, <a href="http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/women/articles/2005/09/16/lawmakers_override_governors_contraception_veto/" target="_hplink">vetoing a widely supported bill</a> that would make the morning-after pill available over the counter in that state and require hospitals to offer emergency contraception to rape victims.</p>
<p>His surprising veto did not stand. The Massachusetts state Senate voted unanimously to overrule it, and the state House voted 139-16 to do the same.</p></blockquote>
<p>Imagine that.</p>
<p>If he does get the GOP nomination, this multi-millionaire&#8217;s record will speak for itself, even as he tries to blow smoke over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/willard-mitt-romney-the-un-artful-dodger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Punished for Living Too Long,&#8217; Paralyzed High School Football Player Dies at 27</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/punished-for-living-too-long-paralyzed-high-school-football-player-dies-at-27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/punished-for-living-too-long-paralyzed-high-school-football-player-dies-at-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicagoland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sad news comes from the Chicago Tribune: &#8220;Rasul &#8220;Rocky&#8221; Clark, who was paralyzed while playing football for Blue Island&#8217;s Eisenhower High School in 2000 and later fought an unsuccessful battle to keep his health insurance, died Thursday after undergoing surgery at Ingalls Memorial Hospital in Harvey, a hospital spokeswoman said.&#8221; More from the Trib: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 532px"><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-paralyzed-high-school-football-player-dies-at-27-20120105,0,5693823.story"><img class=" " title="Rocky Clark in his home in Robbins in 2010." src="http://www.chicagotribune.com/media/photo/2012-01/247832260-05181403.jpg" alt="Rocky Clark in his home in Robbins in 2010." width="522" height="362" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Rocky Clark in his home in Robbins in 2010.</p></div>
<p>The sad news comes from the <a title="Paralyzed football player dies at 27" href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-paralyzed-high-school-football-player-dies-at-27-20120105,0,5693823.story">Chicago Tribune</a>: &#8220;Rasul &#8220;Rocky&#8221; Clark, who was paralyzed while playing football for Blue Island&#8217;s Eisenhower High School in 2000 and later fought an unsuccessful battle to keep his health insurance, died Thursday after undergoing surgery at Ingalls Memorial Hospital in Harvey, a hospital spokeswoman said.&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="Paralyzed football player dies at 27" href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-paralyzed-high-school-football-player-dies-at-27-20120105,0,5693823.story">More from the Trib</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>He was a 16-year-old backup running back on Sept. 15, 2000, when Eisenhower&#8217;s starting running back separated his shoulder in a game at Oak Forest High School. Mr. Clark went into the game. Four plays later, he was tackled and suffered two broken vertebrae in his neck and a spinal injury.</p>
<p>Left a quadriplegic, Mr. Clark for 10 years received top-notch health care through the catastrophic medical insurance provided by Community High School District 218. That included nurses in his home around the clock, access to pain medicines and prescriptions and a storeroom of supplies.</p>
<p>But in August 2010, Clark was informed the $5 million health insurance had reached its maximum and would no longer cover his medical needs. Officials with Clark&#8217;s insurance agency, Health Special Risk Inc., previously declined to discuss his case or their policies on claims and lifetime maximums with the Tribune.</p>
<p>At the time his policy ended, Clark said he felt he was being punished for living too long. Many quadriplegics die within 10 years after their injury because of lung or kidney failure. But Clark was able to thrive, in part because of the meticulous health care he received, his physician and family members said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Punished for living too long.</p>
<p><a title="Paralyzed football player dies at 27" href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-paralyzed-high-school-football-player-dies-at-27-20120105,0,5693823.story">Read the whole story here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/punished-for-living-too-long-paralyzed-high-school-football-player-dies-at-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Santorum&#8217;s Wife had a Second-term Abortion &#8211; But That&#8217;s Supposed to be Different</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/rick-santorums-wife-had-a-second-term-abortion-but-thats-supposed-to-be-different/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/rick-santorums-wife-had-a-second-term-abortion-but-thats-supposed-to-be-different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We must tread lightly regarding family members of candidates. Still, when anyone takes radical positions, preaches endlessly and with great sanctimony, well, that candidate merits closer attention &#8211; especially if that candidate wants to be President of the United States. Frankly, I am in shock as I write this. Rick Santorum&#8217;s wife had a second-term [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must tread lightly regarding family members of candidates. Still, when anyone takes radical positions, preaches endlessly and with great sanctimony, well, that candidate merits closer attention &#8211; especially if that candidate wants to be President of the United States.</p>
<p>Frankly, I am in shock as I write this.</p>
<p>Rick Santorum&#8217;s wife had a second-term abortion to save her life, so reports <a href="http://oursilverribbon.org/">oursilverribbon.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rick Santorum is one dangerously confused denialist. The former Pennsylvania Senator and presidential aspirant is best known for his inability to associate his professed compassion for life at the level of the zygote, with the physical realities of human sexuality.  He has equated loving same-sex relationships to bestiality.  He is opposed to abortion under any circumstance. Almost.</p>
<p>In October, 1996, his wife Karen had a second trimester abortion.  They don’t like to describe it that way. In his 2004 interview with Terry Gross, Santorum characterizes the fetus, who must be treated as an autonomous person, as a practically a gunslinging threat, whom the mother must murder in self-defense. Karen has had to justify her decision to save her own life by explaining that if she died her other children would have lost a mother.</p></blockquote>
<p>The compassionate side of me says this is an incredibly private family issue. However, the Santorums have already discussed this publicly.</p>
<p>Read for yourself and decide: <a href="http://oursilverribbon.org/blog/?p=188">http://oursilverribbon.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2012/01/rick-santorums-wife-had-a-second-term-abortion-but-thats-supposed-to-be-different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Growing Wealth Widens Distance Between Lawmakers and Constituents</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/washington-post-growing-wealth-widens-distance-between-lawmakers-and-constituents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/washington-post-growing-wealth-widens-distance-between-lawmakers-and-constituents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Washington Post: The growth of income inequality has tracked very closely with measures of political polarization, which has been gauged using the average difference between the liberal/conservative scores for Republican and Democratic members of the House. “The proximity of these trends is uncanny,” according to a 2003 paper by researchers Nolan McCarty, Keith [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/growing-wealth-widens-distance-between-lawmakers-and-constituents/2011/12/05/gIQAR7D6IP_story.html" target="_blank">From the Washington Post</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The growth of income inequality has tracked very closely with measures of political polarization, which has been gauged using the average difference between the liberal/conservative scores for Republican and Democratic members of the House.</p>
<p>“The proximity of these trends is uncanny,” according to a 2003 paper by researchers Nolan McCarty, Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal. “Remarkably, the trends of economic inequality and elite political polarization have moved almost in tandem for the past half-century.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent commentary on this <a href="http://www.coffeepartyusa.com/divide-and-conquer" target="_blank">from Eric Byler at Coffee Party USA</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/washington-post-growing-wealth-widens-distance-between-lawmakers-and-constituents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After This, Isn&#8217;t It Time Notre Dame Finally Recognizes Its Gay Student Groups? (Video and More)</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/after-this-isnt-it-time-notre-dame-finally-recognizes-its-gay-student-groups-video-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/after-this-isnt-it-time-notre-dame-finally-recognizes-its-gay-student-groups-video-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Notre Dame will permit this kind of thing to take place on campus, can official recognition of the University&#8217;s gay groups Outreach and GALA be far behind? Let&#8217;s go, Irish!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="cc"><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/A5StYNnfkDU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
</div>
<p>If Notre Dame will permit this kind of thing to take place on campus, can official recognition of the University&#8217;s gay groups Outreach and GALA be far behind?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go, Irish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/after-this-isnt-it-time-notre-dame-finally-recognizes-its-gay-student-groups-video-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Liberal Values: To Hell With Facts–Rick Santorum Wants To Keep Science Out Of Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/from-liberal-values-to-hell-with-facts-rick-santorum-wants-to-keep-science-out-of-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/from-liberal-values-to-hell-with-facts-rick-santorum-wants-to-keep-science-out-of-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Liberal Values by our good friend Ron Chusid: Conservatives have developed their own “news” sources such as Fox and right wing talk radio to protect them from hearing actual facts about the outside world. When the wish to hide the fact that they are promoting views which directly contradict the views of the Founding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="To Hell with Facts" href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2011/12/10/to-hell-with-facts-rick-santorum-wants-to-keep-science-out-of-politics/" target="_blank">From Liberal Values</a> by our good friend Ron Chusid:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Conservatives have developed their own “news” sources such as Fox and right wing talk radio to protect them from hearing actual facts about the outside world. When the wish to hide the fact that they are promoting views which directly contradict the views of the Founding Fathers on subjects such as separation of church and state, they promote their own <a href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2007/06/28/fact-checking-wall-of-separation/">revisionist history</a>. They ignore sound economic principles to promote their brand of Voodoo Economics, regardless of how often their economic view fail in the real world. Conservatives especially concentrate on <a title="Ross Douthout Shows Rejection of Science Is Necessary To Succeed In GOP" href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2011/12/01/ross-douthout-shows-rejection-of-science-is-necessary-to-succeed-in-gop/">rejecting science</a> when the facts contradict their views, including on creationism, denying <a title="Grand Canyon Created by Biblical Flood or Geological Forces? Guess Where Bush Administraiton Stands" href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2006/12/29/grand-canyon-created-by-biblical-flood-or-geological-forces-guess-where-bush-administraiton-stands/">geology</a> and cosmology when it contradicts their views on the creation of the earth and the universe, and denying climate change.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I’ve had numerous discussions with conservatives who have openly rejected science, believing scientific evidence can be ignored when it contradicts their religious beliefs, but political leaders are rarely as open in their contempt for science. <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/santorum-science-should-get-out-of-politics.php">Rick Santorum</a> is an exception in his open hostility towards science. He opposes keeping religion out of government, but does want to keep science out. According to the<a href="http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.com/2011/12/09/santorum-parents-not-obama-know-what-is-best-for-their-childs-education/"> Des Moines Register</a>, while discussing controversial subjects such as evolution and global warming, Santorum suggested that “science should get out of politics.”</p>
<p><a title="To Hell with Facts" href="http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2011/12/10/to-hell-with-facts-rick-santorum-wants-to-keep-science-out-of-politics/" target="_blank">Read the entire post here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/from-liberal-values-to-hell-with-facts-rick-santorum-wants-to-keep-science-out-of-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hint to Obama Haters: &#8220;Obamacare&#8221; is Paid For, Year-by-year</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/hint-to-obama-haters-obamacare-is-paid-for-year-by-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/hint-to-obama-haters-obamacare-is-paid-for-year-by-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Paul Krugman at the NYTimes (for those of you who work for Fox News and have no degrees in economics, he has a NOBEL PRIZE in economics): I assume that this is coming from some right-wing source. But you know, the CBO has a web site, and it&#8217;s easy to check this; there&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/12/paying-for-health-reform/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&amp;seid=auto" target="_blank">From Paul Krugman at the NYTimes</a> (for those of you who work for Fox News and have no degrees in economics, he has a NOBEL PRIZE in economics):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I assume that this is coming from some right-wing source. But you know, the CBO has a web site, and it&rsquo;s easy to check this; there&rsquo;s a convenient summary of the estimates <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12033">here</a>. .And, well, the estimates say that the reform is fully paid for:</p>
</blockquote>
<div>
<blockquote>
<p><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2011/12/12/opinion/121211krugman2/121211krugman2-blog480.jpg" id="100000001222516" width="480" height="349" alt="" /></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote>
<p>Oh, and it&rsquo;s paid for year by year, too — whatever you may have heard about 10 years of taxes paying for 6 years of coverage, or whatever, they&rsquo;re basically lies.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/12/paying-for-health-reform/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&amp;seid=auto" target="_blank">More here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/hint-to-obama-haters-obamacare-is-paid-for-year-by-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSNBC: Government Tested AIDS Drugs on Foster Kids Without Federal Law Protection</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/msnbc-government-tested-aids-drugs-on-foster-kids-without-federal-law-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/msnbc-government-tested-aids-drugs-on-foster-kids-without-federal-law-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incredibly disturbing news from MSNBC: Government-funded researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children over the past two decades, often without providing them a basic protection afforded in federal law and required by some states, an Associated Press review has found. The research funded by the National Institutes of Health spanned the country. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7736157/ns/health-aids/t/government-tested-aids-drugs-foster-kids/#.TubOKGMk67s" target="_blank">Incredibly disturbing news from MSNBC</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Government-funded researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children over the past two decades, often without providing them a basic protection afforded in federal law and required by some states, an Associated Press review has found.</p>
<p>The research funded by the National Institutes of Health spanned the country. It was most widespread in the 1990s as foster care agencies sought treatments for their HIV-infected children that weren&rsquo;t yet available in the marketplace.</p>
<p>The practice ensured that foster children — mostly poor or minority — received care from world-class researchers at government expense, slowing their rate of death and extending their lives. But it also exposed a vulnerable population to the risks of medical research and drugs that were known to have serious side effects in adults and for which the safety for children was unknown.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7736157/ns/health-aids/t/government-tested-aids-drugs-foster-kids/#.TubOKGMk67s" target="_blank">Read more and weep for the children</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/msnbc-government-tested-aids-drugs-on-foster-kids-without-federal-law-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYTimes: U.S. Rejects Plan to Widen Availability of Morning-After Pill</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/nytimes-u-s-rejects-plan-to-widen-availability-of-morning-after-pill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/nytimes-u-s-rejects-plan-to-widen-availability-of-morning-after-pill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disappointing news from the New York Times: In a surprise move, the nation&#8217;s health secretary stopped the Plan B morning-after pill from moving onto drugstore shelves next to the condoms, deciding Wednesday that young girls shouldn&#8217;t be able to buy it on their own. The Food and Drug Administration was preparing to lift a controversial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointing news <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011/12/07/health/AP-US-MED-Morning-After-Pill.html?hp">from the New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In a surprise move, the nation&#8217;s health secretary stopped the <a title="Recent and archival health news about Plan B (Contraceptive)." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/p/planb_contraceptive/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier">Plan B</a> morning-after pill from moving onto drugstore shelves next to the <a title="Recent and archival health news about condoms." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/condoms/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier">condoms</a>, deciding Wednesday that young girls shouldn&#8217;t be able to buy it on their own.</p>
<p>The Food and Drug Administration was preparing to lift a controversial age limit and make Plan B One-Step the nation&#8217;s first over-the-counter emergency contraceptive, available for purchase by people of any age without a prescription.</p>
<p>But Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius intervened at the eleventh hour and overruled her own experts.</p>
<p>Plan B instead will remain behind the pharmacy counter, as it is sold today — available without a prescription only for those 17 and older who show an ID proving their age.</p></blockquote>
<p>That this comes from this sometimes-perplexing Democratic administration is one thing. That the move comes in direct opposition to the administration&#8217;s own experts baffles me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/nytimes-u-s-rejects-plan-to-widen-availability-of-morning-after-pill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Congress (Read &#8211; The GOP) Does Not Act, Middle Class Taxes Will Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/if-congress-read-the-gop-does-not-act-middle-class-taxes-will-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/if-congress-read-the-gop-does-not-act-middle-class-taxes-will-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 04:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turningleft.net/?p=3598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s simple. If Congress &#8212; meaning the Republicans in Congress as Democrats are on board &#8212; does not support President Obama&#8217;s plan to extend and expand the payroll tax cut, middle class taxes will rise. Find out how much your taxes will rise here. I will lose over $1000.  How much will you lose? Watch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simple.</p>
<p>If Congress &#8212; meaning the Republicans in Congress as Democrats are on board &#8212; does not support President Obama&#8217;s plan to extend and expand the payroll tax cut, middle class taxes will rise.</p>
<p><a title="Jobs Act Calculator" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/economy/jobsact/calculator" target="_blank">Find out how much your taxes will rise here</a>.</p>
<p>I will lose over $1000.  How much will you lose?</p>
<p>Watch and read President Obama&#8217;s <a title="Extending and expanding the payroll tax cut" href="http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/latest-national/29308-weekly-address-extending-and-expanding-the-payroll-tax-cut-video-text.html" target="_blank">weekly address here on this crucial issue</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.turningleft.net/2011/12/if-congress-read-the-gop-does-not-act-middle-class-taxes-will-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

