On the Liberal Front

+menu -


  • Category Archives Conservatives
  • Bloomberg: Gingrich Sued for Using ‘Eye of the Tiger’ at Campaign Stops

    From Bloomberg News:

    Newt Gingrich, fighting for the Republican Party’s nomination to challenge President Barack Obama in the 2012 election, was sued for unauthorized use of “Eye of the Tiger,” the Grammy-winning theme song from “Rocky III.”

    Rude Music Inc., an Illinois corporation owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the song, sued the candidate today in federal court inChicago, seeking a court order blocking Gingrich’s unauthorized use of the song at campaign rallies. Rude Music is also seeking unspecified money damages.

    Newt 2012 Inc. and the American Conservative Union, a political advocacy group, are also named as defendants in the five-page complaint.

    You mean you can’t just take anyone’s music and play it anywhere, particularly for the purpose of raising money for your own political campaign? What? What about the First Amendment.

    Oh. Right.

    That doesn’t apply in this case.

    Yoi. Another ethical lapse for the former speaker?

    And, yes, you can be sued for stealing music.

    Is that what Newt did? The courts will decide.


  • The Muppets Attack Fox News: Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy Speak (Video)

    Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy hit back at Fox News during a UK press conference following the London Premiere of their new film. Fox had publically criticized the film for supposedly pushing a ‘dangerous liberal agenda’ at kids.

    Kermit mocks their blatant and pointless fear mongering before Miss Piggy offers her own opinion on Fox News.

    Camera and Post by Russell Nelson.

    So, so cool.

    Tip of the hat to Media Matters for America.


  • Earth to Newt Gingrich: Phone Home

    The title is suggested from Charles M. Blow’s wonderful critique of Newt Gingrich 2011-12, still the Newt of the 90s, even if the GOP dares not recall:

    Gingrich told a crowd on Florida’s so-called Space Coast on Wednesday that “by the end of my second term, we will have the first permanent base on the Moon. And it will be American.” And he said that he would push for the introduction of a “Northwest Ordinance for Space” so that when the number of colonists reached 13,000, they could petition for statehood.

    (By the way, I find it interesting that Gingrich didn’t insist on answering the question about Puerto Rican statehood at Thursday’s debate, yet he’s advocating for a state on the Moon. Earth to Newt: phone home.)

    The writer notes former Senator Bob Dole’s concerns as well:

    One of the latest establishment Republicans to try to avert the Gingrich catastrophe is former Senator Bob Dole, who wrote a letter to the Romney campaign on Thursday saying: “I have not been critical of Newt Gingrich, but it is now time to take a stand before it is too late.” It only got better from there. Dole continued, “hardly anyone who served with Newt in Congress has endorsed him, and that fact speaks for itself. He was a one-man-band who rarely took advice.”

    How long until Newt is tossed aside?

    Or, dare we say it, how long until he wins the nomination from the GOP? Then what? Will the Dems finally win the south again, as well as the east, west and north?


  • Catholic Leaders Challenge Gingrich and Santorum on Divisive Rhetoric Around Race and Poverty

    From Faith in Public Life:

    More than 40 national Catholic leaders and prominent theologians at universities across the country released a strongly worded open letter today urging “our fellow Catholics Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum to stop perpetuating ugly racial stereotypes on the campaign trail.”

    In the lead up to Saturday’s primary in South Carolina, Newt Gingrich has frequently blasted President Obama as a “food stamp president” and implied that some African Americans are more content to collect welfare benefits than work. Rick Santorum attracted scrutiny for telling Iowa voters he doesn’t want “to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.”

    The open letter reminds the two presidential candidates, vying for Christian conservative voters, that U.S. Catholic bishops have called racism an “intrinsic evil” and consistently defend vital government programs such as food stamps and unemployment benefits that help struggling Americans.

    The full text of the statement and signatories follow.

    An Open Letter to Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum:

    As Catholic leaders who recognize that the moral scandals of racism and poverty remain a blemish on the American soul, we challenge our fellow Catholics Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum to stop perpetuating ugly racial stereotypes on the campaign trail. Mr. Gingrich has frequently attacked President Obama as a “food stamp president” and claimed that African Americans are content to collect welfare benefits rather than pursue employment. Campaigning in Iowa, Mr. Santorum remarked: “I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.” Labeling our nation’s first African-American president with a title that evokes the past myth of “welfare queens” and inflaming other racist caricatures is irresponsible, immoral and unworthy of political leaders.

    Some presidential candidates now courting “values voters” seem to have forgotten that defending human life and dignity does not stop with protecting the unborn. We remind Mr. Gingrich and Mr. Santorum that Catholic bishops describe racism as an “intrinsic evil” and consistently defend vital government programs such as food stamps and unemployment benefits that help struggling Americans. At a time when nearly 1 in 6 Americans live in poverty, charities and the free market alone can’t address the urgent needs of our most vulnerable neighbors. And while jobseekers outnumber job openings 4-to-1, suggesting that the unemployed would rather collect benefits than work is misleading and insulting.

    As the South Carolina primary approaches, we urge Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Santorum and all presidential candidates to reject the politics of racial division, refrain from offensive rhetoric and unite behind an agenda that promotes racial and economic justice.

    Francis X. Doyle
    Associate General Secretary
    U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (retired)

    Sisters of Mercy of the Americas Institute Leadership Team:
    Sisters Patricia McDermott, RSM (President) Eileen Campbell, RSM Anne Curtis, RSM Mary Pat Gavin, RSM Deborah Troillett, RSM

    Sister Pat Farrell, OSF
    President
    Leadership Conference of Women Religious

    Rev. Bryan N. Massingale
    Associate Professor of Theology
    Marquette University

    Rev. Clete Kiley
    Director for Immigration Policy
    UNITE HERE

    Rev. Anthony J. Pogorelc,  M.Div., Ph.D.
    The Catholic University of America
    Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies

    Rev. David Hollenbach, S.J.
    University Chair in Human Rights and International Justice
    Boston College

    Sr. Patricia J. Chappell, SNDdeN
    Executive Director, Pax Christi USA

    Marie Dennis
    Co-President, Pax Christi International

    Rev. John F. Kavanaugh S.J.
    Professor of Philosophy
    St. Louis University

    Rev. Jim Keenan, S.J.
    Founders Professor in Theology
    Boston College

    Rev. Thomas J. Reese, S.J.
    Senior Fellow
    Woodstock Theological Center
    Georgetown University

    Sister Mary Ellen Howard
    Executive Director
    Cabrini Clinic, Detroit

    Rev. James E. Hug, S.J.
    President
    Center of Concern

    Sister Simone Campbell
    Executive Director
    NETWORK, A Catholic Social Justice Lobby

    Steven Schneck
    Director
    Institute for Policy Research and Catholic Studies
    The Catholic University of America

    Sister Karen M. Donahue, RSM
    Justice Team
    Sisters of Mercy West Midwest Community

    Sister Mary Ann Hinsdale
    Assoc. Prof. of Theology
    Boston College

    Tom Allio
    Cleveland Diocesan Social Action Director (retired)

    M. Shawn Copeland
    Associate Professor of Theology
    Boston College

    Sister Maria Riley, OP
    Senior Advisor
    Center of Concern

    Todd Whitmore
    Associate Professor
    Department of Theology
    University of Notre Dame

    Terrence W. Tilley
    Avery Cardinal Dulles, S.J., Professor of Catholic Theology
    Chair
    Theology Department
    Fordham University, Bronx, NY

    Michael E. Lee
    Associate Professor
    Theology Department
    Fordham University, Bronx, NY

    Paul Lakeland
    Aloysius P. Kelley S.J. Professor of Catholic Studies
    Director, Center for Catholic Studies Fairfield University

    Lisa Sowle Cahill
    Monan Professor of Theology
    Boston College

    Eric LeCompte
    Board Member
    Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good

    Tobias Winright
    Associate Professor of Theological Ethics
    Saint Louis University

    Christopher Pramuk
    Assistant Professor of Theology
    Xavier University, Cincinnati

    John Sniegocki
    Associate Professor of Christian Ethics
    Xavier University, Cincinnati

    Kathleen Maas Weigert
    Carolyn Farrell, BVM Professor of Women and Leadership
    Loyola University, Chicago

    Daniel K. Finn
    Professor of Theology and Economics
    St. John’s University, Minnesota

    Gerald J. Beyer
    Associate Professor of Christian Social Ethics
    Department of Theology and Religious Studies
    Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia

    Jeannine Hill Fletcher
    Associate Professor of Theology
    Faculty Director
    Dorothy Day Center for Service and Justice
    Fordham University, Bronx, NY

    Sister Mary Ann Hinsdale
    Assoc. Prof. of Theology
    Boston College

    John Inglis
    Professor and Chair
    Department of Philosophy
    University of Dayton

    Anthony B. Smith
    Associate Professor
    Department of Religious Studies
    University of Dayton

    David O’Brien
    University Professor of Faith and Culture
    University of Dayton

    William L. Portier
    Mary Ann Spearin Chair of Catholic Theology
    University of Dayton

    Alex Mikulich
    Research Fellow
    Jesuit Social Research Institute
    Loyola University, New Orleans

    Susan M. Weishar
    Migration Specialist
    Jesuit Social Research Institute
    Loyola University

    Kristin Heyer
    Associate Professor
    Religious Studies
    Santa Clara University

    James Salt
    Executive Director
    Catholics United

    Vincent Miller
    Professor of Religious Studies
    University of Dayton

    Nancy Dallavalle
    Associate Professor and Chair
    Department of Religious Studies
    Fairfield University

    Source: http://www.faithinpubliclife.org


  • Newt Gingrich Wanted an Open Marriage, Says Second Wife

    Try to keep up. It’s tough.

    From the Wall Street Journal:

    Newt Gingrich wanted an open marriage, former wife Marianne Gingrich said in an interview with ABC News.

    ABC just put out a video clip and excerpts of the interview, which is scheduled to air on Nightline tonight after the GOP presidential debate in South Carolina. Ms. Gingrich, who was married to the former House speaker for 18 years, said she is disclosing details of her marriage now to tell voters what she knows about Mr. Gingrich’s character. The two divorced in 1999, after, she says, Mr. Gingrich had suggested an open marriage that would allow him to continue an affair with Callista Bisek,  the congressional aide who later became his third wife.

    Ms. Gingrich told ABC’s Brian Ross that after Mr. Gingrich made that suggestion, “I just stared at him and he said, ‘Callista doesn’t care what I do’…  He wanted an open marriage and I refused.”

    That’s Newt Gingrich, conservative Catholic.

    Yoi.


  • Did You Get Your Last Shoeshine on the Tarmac Like Mitt Romney?

    Mitt Romney getting his shoes shined on the tarmac.
    Mitt Romney getting his shoes shined on the tarmac.

    If you got your last shoeshine on the tarmac at an airport — any airport — than chances are you, like Willard “Mitt” Romney have more money than most of the top 1%.

    From Rachel Maddow on MSNBC:

    Mitt Romney has an empathy problem. Regardless of whether he’s actually an empathetic guy, Mr. Romney remains the son of a wealthy man who then went out and made another fortunebuying companies and firing people. He’s still the guy who says that questions about income inequality amount to the sin of envy, he’s still the guy who manages to say the words “I like to be able to fire people,” he’s still the guy who offers up a $10,000 bet to prove his point. He’s still the guy who drove to Canada with the family dog in a kennel on top of the car and who responded to evidence of the family dog’s distress by stopping at a car wash to rinse it away.

    The last link in the paragraph above goes to a story when Romney, like Chevy Chase’s fictional character  Clark Griswold, abused a family pet on a family vacation. Clark killed the dog when he took off with the dog tethered to the family wagon. Mitt literally scared the you-know-what out of the poor beast by strapping it to the top of the family wagon while en route to Canada.

    That story is here.


  • Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney: The (Un-)Artful Dodger

    Ask Romney Anything?
    Ask Willard "Mitt" Romney, the (Un-)Artful Dodger, anything? Really?

    For those who watched the GOP circular firing squad Saturday night, you may recall Mitt Romney referring to a question about states banning birth control “silly.”

    The only thing “silly” was his dodge, as he tried to deny his own state the right to offer birth control in 2005.

    From the Huffington Post:

    Mitt Romney artfully dodged a question about whether states have the right to ban birth control during Saturday’s Republican presidential debate, calling the question “silly” and saying that states wouldn’t want to do that anyway. But as governor of Massachusetts in 2005, Romney took a harder line on contraception, vetoing a widely supported bill that would make the morning-after pill available over the counter in that state and require hospitals to offer emergency contraception to rape victims.

    His surprising veto did not stand. The Massachusetts state Senate voted unanimously to overrule it, and the state House voted 139-16 to do the same.

    Imagine that.

    If he does get the GOP nomination, this multi-millionaire’s record will speak for itself, even as he tries to blow smoke over it.


  • Santorum: I Cashed In Because I Care

    I actually watched tonight’s GOP presidential debate. Saw no one that appeared very presidential. Much, much pandering to the far, far right.

    Every time Rick Santorum spoke he looked like a nervous schoolboy who had to pee.  No kidding.

    Not my observation, but the observation of someone with whom I was watching.

    Still, Santorum managed to defend the massive amounts of money he made from lobbying since he lost his U.S. Senate seat.

    From Mother Jones:

    During Saturday’s GOP Primary debate, Rep. Ron Paul accused Rick Santorum of being a “big government person” who exploited his beltway connections with lobbyists to get wealthy after losing his Senate seat in 2006. Santorum insisted that he only took a series of high paying “consulting” jobs because he believed in the causes.

    “I’m known in this race and I was known in Washington, DC, as a cause guy. I am a cause guy. I care deeply about this country and about the causes that make me —that I think are at the core of this country,” Santorum said. “And when I left the United States Senate, I got involved in causes that I believe in.”

    Santorum was one of the less wealthy members of the Senate during his tenure, though as the main gatekeeper for the “K-Street Project,” the attempt to place Republicans in influential positions in DC lobbying firms, Santorum developed plenty of key connections with lobbying firms and trade associations. After leaving Congress those connections proved financially beneficial. Financial disclosure forms filed last year indicate that Santorum went from making around $200,000 a year to more than a million dollars in 2010.

    Washington, as it stands now, is an incredible cash cow for these GOP candidates. Do you really think any of them will change that in the least if they win the presidency?